“They think kids are stupid”: yPAR and confrontations with institutionalized power as contexts for children’s identity work

Danielle Kohfeldt, Alexandra Rae Bowen, Regina Day Langhout

Resumen


Through bringing together literature on identity work, participatory action research, and critical literacy, the current study examines the identity work of low-income and working class youth of color (predominantly Latinx) as they confronted obstacles in their efforts to enact school change. Within a youth participatory action research (yPAR) program, youth created a mural to represent community members’ stories about times they felt they did or did not have the power to change something in their community. Research questions were: (1) How might yPAR serve as a context for children’s identity work? And (2), how do children in a yPAR program respond to obstacles in their efforts to perform identities as social change agents? Results examine the process of mural symbol creation and are based on analyses of ethnographic field notes from 13 program meetings. Through encounters, youth engage with power as it relates to their social identities in the following: yPAR serves as a context for children’s identity work by providing them a space where they can co-construct critical engagement, and read identity and power in text and images. They respond to obstacles by critically engaging with conflict, and performing change agent identities.

Texto completo:

PDF (ENGLISH)

Referencias


Ahrens, C. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social relations on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263–274.

Bigler,R.S.,Arthur,A.E.,Hughes,J.M.,&Patterson,M.M.(2008).

The politics of race and gender: Children’s perceptions of discrimi-

nation and the U. S. presidency. Analyses of Social Issues and Pub-

lic Policy, 8,1–30.

Bigler, R.S., Arthur, A.E., Hughes, J.M., & Patterson, M.M. (2008). The politics of race and gender: Children’s perceptions of discrimination and the U. S. presidency. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8, 1–30.

Bigler, R.S., & Liben, L.S. (1993). A cognitive-developmental approach to racial stereotyping and reconstructive memory in Euro-American children. Child Development, 64, 1507–1518.

Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.

Comber, B. (2001, April). Critical literacy: What is it, and what does it look like in elementary classrooms? School Talk, 6(3), 1-2.

Comber, B, & Nixon, H. (2004). Children re-read and re-write their local neighbourhoods: Critical literacies and identity work. In J. Evans (Ed.), Literacy moves on: Using popular culture, new technologies, and critical literacy in the primary classroom. New York: David Fulton Publishers.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.

Dewhurst, M. (2011). Where is the action? Three lenses to analyze social justice art education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 44, 364-378.

Duane, A.M. (2013). The children’s table: Childhood studies and the humanities. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Duckett, P. Kagan, C., & Sixsmith, J. (2010). Consultation and participation with children in healthy schools: choice, conflict, and context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2), 167-178.

Durand, T.M. & Lykes, M.B. (2006). Think globally, act locally: A global perspective on mobilizing adults for positive youth development. In E.G. Clary & J.E. Rhodes, Mobilizing adults for positive youth development: Strategies for closing the gap between beliefs and behaviors (pp. 233-254). New York: Springer.

Freire, P. & Macedo, D. (1994). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

Gjerde, P. (2014). An evaluation of ethnicity research in developmental psychology: Critiques and recommendations. Human Development, 57, 176-205.

Gutierrez, K.D. (2008). Developing sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148-164.

Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity? In S. Hall and P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage.

Hammack, P.L. (2015). Theoretical foundations of identity. In K.C. McLean & M. Syed (Eds.), Oxford handbook of identity development (p. 11-30). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hayward, C. R. (2000). De-facing power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hill Collins, P (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed). New York: Routledge.

Hurtado, A. (1997). Understanding multiple group identities: Inserting women into cultural transformations. Journal of Social Issues, 53(2), 299-327.

Hurtado, A. (2003). Voicing Chicana feminisms: Young women speak out on sexuality and identity. New York: New York University Press.

Hurtado, A., & Silva, J. (2008). Creating new social identities in children through critical multicultural media: The case of Little Bill, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 120, 17-30.

James, A. (2011). To be (come) or not to be (come): Understanding children’s citizenship. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 633, 167-179.

James, A. & James, A.L. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy and social practice. New York: Pelgrave MacMillan.

Langhout, R.D. & Thomas, E. (2010). Imagining participatory action research in collaboration with children: An introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 60-66.

Liben, L.S., & Bigler, R.S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(Serial No. 269).

Mahalingam, R. (2007). Essentialism, power, and the representation of social categories: A folk


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.